Badmouthing Spouses: Balancing Free Speech with Common Sense

Alan R. Feigenbaum ●

New York Law Journal, March 27, 2025 —

During a divorce one or both spouses may feel compelled to establish within their community of family and friends the “why,” i.e., each spouse’s explanation as to why the marriage broke down. This is particularly relevant in American culture which, regrettably, can be quick to judge when word gets out that a couple is going through a divorce.

How spouses go about explaining the “why” can take various forms. Some spouses have heart-to-heart, private conversations with their treating mental health professionals. Others, much to the chagrin of their divorce lawyers, may go nuclear and find comfort in a very public social media rant.

The question becomes whether or not spouses are faced with any limitations on speech when they choose—if they do—to discuss their divorce and/or the information they learn during their divorce with third parties.

That brings us to Justice Jeffrey S. Sunshine’s recent decision in T.I. v. R.I., 2025 NY Slip Op 50115(U) (Sup. Ct., Kings Cty. 2025). At the outset, I note that a large portion of the T.I. decision relates to the plaintiff-wife’s motion to disqualify the defendant-husband’s counsel from representing the husband because his counsel was subsequently retained by the husband’s brother in a malicious prosecution action against the wife.

Read more on our website.

In the News

Below is a roundup of Blank Rome Matrimonial and Family Law partners’ recent awards, recognitions, media, and other accomplishments from around the country.

The Sky is the Limit. Top LA Attorney Stacy D. Phillips Gets Up Close and Personal on Her Lifestyle Podcast “Stacy Phillips & Friends”
February 6, 2025 – Blank Rome partner Stacy D. Phillips was featured in this Beverly Hills Times Magazine article discussing her newly launched podcast, “Stacy Phillips & Friends.”

Kristina Royce Joins The Wall Street Skinny Podcast
February 3, 2025 – Blank Rome partner Kristina Royce joined hosts Kristen Kelly and Jen Saarbach on The Wall Street Skinny podcast to discuss why individuals need to be well-informed about their legal rights and obligations, particularly concerning marriage and financial matters.

Child Custody: The Dangers of ‘Rules of Thumb’
January 30, 2025 – Blank Rome partner Dylan S. Mitchell authored this New York Law Journal article discussing the common principle regarding on acting on what is in the best interests of children.

5 Challenges with Changing Your Name That No One Tells You
January 28, 2025 – Blank Rome partner Ernestine J. Mings was featured in this The Knot article discussing the potential challenges when one has to change their legal name.

Continue reading

Attorney Spotlight: Jacqueline Combs—Los Angeles

Stacy D. Phillips ●

For this edition of Attorney Spotlight, I am proud to feature one of my esteemed Los Angeles colleagues in Blank Rome’s Matrimonial & Family Law group: Jacqueline Combs.

Jacqueline Combs
Partner

A graduate of the University of California, Los Angeles, and the Chapman University School of Law, Jackie has proven to be an indispensable member of our firm’s Matrimonial & Family Law practice group. Formerly an associate at the firm, Jackie was recently elevated to partner at Blank Rome. I am thrilled that she has achieved this very distinctive honor. 

Having been practicing law for more than 12 years, Jackie began her legal career as a corporate counsel for private and publicly traded companies and worked with clients on high-stakes business and legal issues. Over time, she found she wanted more direct ways to help people through her practice, which led Jackie to pursue family law. Jackie has integrated her experience as corporate counsel into her family law practice. A successful lawyer must excel in negotiation, especially in family law cases. Jackie exemplifies this by consistently bringing her exceptional negotiation skills to every client and case she handles.

Read more on our website.

Prenuptial Agreement Spousal Support Waivers: Proceed with Caution

Alan R. Feigenbaum

New York Law Journal, February 14, 2025 —

When you utter the words “prenuptial agreement” to a matrimonial lawyer, more often than not you might instantly feel a sense of dread in the air. Some matrimonial lawyers are so adverse to prenuptial agreements that they tell me “I won’t do them anymore”. Other matrimonial lawyers I talk to say that prenuptial agreements should be banned altogether. 

Alas, prenuptial agreements remain alive and well in New York, and so we, as matrimonial lawyers, must confront their ever-present complexities. 

With that in mind, we turn to the critically important decision of Justice Jeffrey S. Sunshine in J.M. v. G.V., 2025 NY Slip Op 25004 (Kings Cty., January 2, 2025). 

In J.M., the parties married in New York on May 23, 2018. One week prior, on May 16, 2018, the parties entered into a prenuptial agreement. The parties had one unemancipated child, born in September 2020. After the plaintiff-wife commenced an action for divorce, the defendant-husband moved for summary judgment to, inter alia, set aside the prenuptial agreement on the basis that the agreement “is unconscionable, fraudulent, and/or the result of overreaching”.

The husband was not represented by counsel during the negotiation and consummation of the prenuptial agreement. He asserted that the wife informed him that “if he wanted to marry her it was required by her family that he signed a prenuptial agreement.” According to the husband, when the prenuptial agreement was signed, the husband had a net worth of $27,000, and the wife had a net worth of over $455,000.

While the focus of this article will be spousal support waivers in prenuptial agreements, there are a multitude of important legal concepts that can be learned from reading the J.M. decision.

Read more on our website.

Relationship Expectations. Expect the Unexpected.

Stacy D. Phillips ●

In any relationship, especially marriage, managing expectations is crucial for achieving and maintaining overall success with your partner. Expectations are dynamic and play a significant role in our lives, defining who we are and shaping our relationships. These expectations come in various forms and magnitudes, influencing how we interact with our partners.

That said, it is not too bold of a statement to say many marriages fail due to our experience with these expectations, and how we react when those expectations are not met is of no less significance. Indeed, it feels great when our expectations are met, and that feeling of being gratified and reciprocated in life is what we have been looking for all along. However, living life by measuring relationships by our own expectations can be harmful, and how we manage these feelings and expectations will often be the determining factor of success or failure.

Read more on our website.

529 Accounts Are Not Your Divorce Piggybank

Alan R. Feigenbaum ●

New York Law Journal, January 10, 2025 —

Matrimonial law is derived from judicial decisions (i.e., “caselaw”) and statutes. As well intentioned and precise as those statutes and the caselaw interpreting them, are and can be, the fact remains that how matrimonial courts apply the law is by and large case specific.

This is a long-winded way of saying that because each matrimonial case tends to depend upon its own unique set of facts, courts are often compelled to reexamine and reevaluate the legislative intent underlying the statutory framework otherwise known as the Domestic Relations Law (the “DRL”).

That brings us to Justice Edmund M. Dane’s recent decision in LKF v. MTF, 2024 NY Slip OP 24312 (Sup. Ct., Nassau Cty. 12/9/2024), which addresses the “novel issue” of “how to classify a 529 account under the Automatic Orders” and “whether or not a party’s post-commencement withdrawal of money from a 529 account to pay their own counsel fees violates” the Automatic Orders.

Preliminarily, as the decision explains, a “529 Account is a type of investment account that someone can use for higher education savings (emphasis added).” See www.nysaves.org. In general terms, inter alia, the Automatic Orders, codified at Section 236 of the DRL, prohibit transfers/withdrawals/sales/encumbrances of various assets while a divorce action is pending absent written consent of the parties or a court order.

Notably for purposes of this discussion, with regard to the restraint on the transfer of assets such as real estate, personal property, cash accounts, stocks, mutual funds, bank accounts, cars, and boats, there is a carve out for transfers made “in the usual course of business, for customary and usual household expenses or for reasonable attorney’s fees” in connection with the divorce action.

Read more on our website.

New Year’s Mandate: Respect Our Matrimonial Judges

Alan R. Feigenbaum ●

New York Law Journal, December 12, 2024 —

When the legal historians write about the year 2024, one has to wonder what will be said. Only time will tell.

What we do know is that the dynamic between divorce litigants and matrimonial judges has been disrupted in ways that are cause for concern. More specifically, in 2024, we have seen various decisions of interest wherein divorce litigants flouted court orders with impunity.

With that in mind, we turn to the recent decision of Justice Edmund M. Dane in Y.R. v. A.O.R. 2024 NY Slip Op 51487(U) (Sup. Ct., Nassau County).

The Y.R. divorce saga involved a “tortured litigation history.” The parties married in 2000, had no unemancipated children, and an action for divorce was filed in 2011.

The parties’ June 2012 stipulation of settlement resolving the divorce action required the wife to either list and sell a residence in Great Neck, New York by March 1, 2017, or purchase the husband’s interest in the residence for $75,000. In short, she did neither.

The husband moved for a warrant of eviction, and the court granted the motion to the extent of setting a date certain by which the wife is to vacate the Great Neck residence, failing which a warrant of eviction “shall be issued” directing her removal by a sheriff.

Read more on our website.

In the News

Below is a roundup of Blank Rome’s Matrimonial & Family Law partners’ recent awards, recognitions, media, and other accomplishments from around the country.

Reconciling the Law of ‘Cohabitation’ with Social Realities
October 10, 2024 – Blank Rome partner Alan R. Feigenbaum authored this New York Law Journal article about alimony payments and when they should be terminated. 

Marilyn B. Chinitz Joins the Women Winning Divorce Podcast
October 7, 2024 – Blank Rome partner Marilyn B. Chinitz joins the Women Winning Divorce podcast to discuss how to handle and divide complex assets, tips for receiving alimony, and strategies to safeguard assets during divorce. 

Continue reading

Attorney Spotlight: Pauline M. Martin—Los Angeles

Stacy D. Phillips ●

For this edition of Attorney Spotlight, I am proud to highlight one of my esteemed Los Angeles colleagues in Blank Rome’s Matrimonial & Family Law group: Pauline M. Martin.

Pauline M. Martin
Of Counsel

A graduate of the University of California, Irvine, and the UCLA School of Law, Pauline has been practicing law for more than 20 years. She is an indispensable member of our firm’s Matrimonial & Family Law practice group. 

Pauline’s journey as a lawyer is remarkable in many ways, and it is notable that she did not begin her career working in family law. Initially, out of law school, Pauline began her practice in a large civil litigation firm. Within 10 years of working in this field, Pauline recognized that she wanted to get more of a “hands-on” legal experience that she felt she had not experienced quite yet as a lawyer. In 2008, Pauline became a mother and realized a new focus in life: family. Pauline spent a few years caring for her son and helping her husband with entrepreneurial ventures. She decided that in becoming a parent, she understood what was important in life and thus began her career path in family law.

Read more on our website.

The Story of Divorce. How It Has Evolved, and Where It Is Going.

Stacy D. Phillips ●

Every experience has a story, even the unpleasant ones. The story, or even the entity of marriage and divorce, whether our own or “divorce” at large, evolves with time. A simple fact is that the longer we have been around, the greater the opportunity to take a look and contemplate where we have been and perhaps even glean where the often lamentable (or, in some cases, welcome) phenomenon of divorce is going.

There was once a time when a divorce that occurred on any basis would be considered unthinkable, even unacceptable, throughout any aspect of life, personal or professional. It is fair to say that the many characteristics of marriage, as well as its potential dissolution, have changed since I first began practicing family law. One important factor I have learned over time is that it takes courage to make marriage work, and divorce is no different. We can also find courage in asking what has changed and why. 

Continue reading